Even before the war was over, scholars in the North and South began to analyze and interpret the reasons behind the bloodshed. The scholars immediately disagreed over the causes of the war and disagreement persists today.
District of Columbia fwb35 said: Because the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
There was no constitution prohibition on secession, nor was there a constitutional sanctioning of any kind of federal coercion to force a state to obey a federal law because to do so was to perpetrate an act of war on the offending state by the other states, for whom the federal government was their agent.
This argument has been made a lot here and elsewhere: I am hoping that maybe our law or government experts can shed light on this.
Generally, an overarching national government governs issues that affect the entire country, and smaller subdivisions govern issues of local concern. Both the national government and the smaller political subdivisions have the power to make laws and both have a certain level Civil war dissolution union autonomy from each other.
The United States has a federal system of governance consisting of the national or federal government, and the government of the individual states. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: It seems to me that the process for the creation or dissolution of the union exists separate and apart from the allocation of powers that can be wielded by either the states or the federal government.
Indeed, when the states came together to form the union, there were no powers. There was no constitution, even. Once they decided to form a union, then they could create a constitution which would decide the powers to be given to the states, or the federal government, or the branches of the federal government.
I see the authority to create or dissolve the government as different from the powers that are allowed under the component parts of the American federalist enterprise. I am not a legal scholar; such a person might say all of the above is hogwash.
Texas v White says: It began among the Colonies, and grew out of common origin, mutual sympathies, kindred principles, similar interests, and geographical relations.
It was confirmed and strengthened by the necessities of war, and received definite form, and character, and sanction from the Articles of Confederation.
In that ruling, SCOTUS mainly discusses the perpetuity of the union, with the note that a state can leave the union "through consent of the States. I hope I am making my question clear. Not being a legal person, I am not sure that I am articulating my question clearly.
Feel free to ask me any questions if you feel I need to clarify something.ON THE DISSOLUTION OF THE UNION. Sir, this is not a question of consequences;—whether, by dissolving the Union, we shall have a civil or servile war, or whether, by preserving the Union, we shall avoid these calamities, and, at some time or other, be permitted to hail the jubilee.
The question has every thing to do with principle, .
Dec 31, · After overthrowing the centuries-old Romanov monarchy, Russia emerged from a civil war in as the newly formed Soviet Union. The world’s first Marxist-Communist state would become one of the. Apr 10, · Is secession/dissolution a "power"?
Discussion in ' Civil War History - Secession and Politics ' started by ForeverFree, Mar 31, Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next >. During the American Civil War (–), the Union, also known as the North, referred to the United States of America and specifically to the national government of President Abraham Lincoln and the 20 free states, as well as 4 border and slave states.
divorce, dissolution of a Civil Union an Retirement Benefits Information for All Funds Page 1 January Fact Sheet #42 ENCUMBRANCES ON YOUR PENSION Although your pension is normally exempt from any liens, the New Jersey Division of Pensions and Bene-fits (NJDPB) will honor court orders for child support, alimony, or equitable distribution.
Apr 10, · Is secession/dissolution a "power"? Discussion in ' Civil War History - Secession and Politics ' started by ForeverFree, Mar 31, Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next >.